Friday, 28 December 2012

The Sound of Silence



(Cinemascope thanks Ms. Camiele White for this excellent take on the use of silence in cinema, which is particularly relevant in this darn noisy world of ours. The 1920 short that she begins her essay with, holds a special place for her - and not just for cinematic reasons - adding an affecting  personal touch to this fine piece)
 
Unlike many of my other posts, this one didn’t come at the hands and sounds of Björk. I was gifted a very rare video – a 10-minute clip of an early silent film, in fact. It was the first (and to my knowledge, only) silent film starring an all Native American cast. My undying admiration and love of my Native American heritage led me to watch every second of this silent piece of cinematic history, and I’m not ashamed to admit that I was almost in tears. However, it wasn’t just the pull of my ancestry (my tribes being Blackfoot on my father’s side and Cherokee on my mother’s) that claimed all the working pieces of my heart. Rather it was the brilliance with which each moment was portrayed, the silence giving depth and purpose to each movement, each exclamation of physicality.



The film, The Daughter of Dawn, is an intimate look at the tradition and beauty of the Cheyenne people. However, more than that it’s simply the love story of two people who were promised to others but found their soul’s counterpart in each other. It’s a common tale, dating back as early as the 15th century, most likely even earlier than that. It’s also a story that through its many permutations can get bogged down with cliché and unoriginality.



But therein lay the beauty inherent in silent film. There are no words, no verbal inflections or cues. All the audience has is the use of human expression and interaction and a loose sense of a story. The grandeur in silence is its ability to transcend expectation and give new form and texture to something as simple as a love story.



There are films even beyond the silent genre that manage to encapsulate their brightest moments in the quiet space between scenes, the whispering tension between two characters. Some of the most incredible in my memory seem to find the fine balance between intimacy and physical largeness.



It’s pretty well documented that I tout Japanese animation as probably the Mecca of all things subtlety. But the truth is, the understanding of how to give the story room to express itself is something so innately ingrained in the very fabric of the culture itself, there’s little doubt who all the real masters of this concept of silence are. Though the films exhibit grand sweeps of illustration, form and soundtrack, the truest moments of elegance and bigness come from the quiet times when even a whisper can break the fragility of the moment. One of the most heartbreaking films ever produced, Takahata Isao’s Grave of the Fireflies opens with a throbbing silence, a pulsating murmur of a dying memory in the heart of a man forced to accept the maturity and fire of wartime Japan. The snapshots of his life drenched in blood and the refuse of adult anger and greed were all posed in shocking bluntness, each moment completely devoid of sound, save perhaps the crackle of fire that seemed to underscore the background music of the film.



However, while Fireflies was a testament to the power of absolute silence in jagged moments of anger and isolation, a film like Les Triplettes de Belleville was a master class in the art of dialogue – or lack thereof in this case. Indeed, there were perhaps five full lines of dialogue in all 80 minutes of the film; however, the music and animation managed to give great texture and depth to the story itself. Indeed, Sylvain Chomet seems to be a master of storytelling, allowing the characters’ experiences to make up for any lack of verbal communication. It’s all in the eyes, in the minute details. The sound itself is secondary, creating a thrumming background music that allows the story to unfold through the music and the movement of the characters.



Of course, the best horror and thriller utilize silence to give the films height and unending cinematic scope. Such films as Se7en and The Exorcist rely on the moments between moments to give the story texture. The tension is palpable, one is literally able to reach out and grab the thickness of certain scenes as if the film itself were attempting to kidnap the viewer and throw her headlong into the madness.



Then there are films like Nakata Hideo’s Ringu. Talk about incredible use of silence, the film is drenched in an unsettling amount of silence, provoking viewers to almost have to fill in the spaces. But what’s so masterful about the piece is that it simply basks in its own largeness without muddying up the story with erroneous bits of flash. It’s as simple as taking a photo, each shot only as big as it’s supposed to be. On the contrary, a film like Miike Takashi’s Audition is all big movements and gruesome moments. Though also heavily steeped in silence, in contrast to the other films, it’s the moments of sound that are so poignant. One almost yearns for silence in order to ease the sickening feeling of foreboding that comes whenever the crazed love interest opens her mouth and traps us in her grisly universe.



I’ve always found the lack of sound an even more exhilarating form of storytelling than even the most astute dialogue. It forces the actors to give in to the drama of the moment, each second poised at attention and ready to burst. I’ve found that even in the absence of music, there’s a bubbling anticipation that these silent moments seem to bring to an explosive crescendo without the crashing of cymbals or the heavy cut of bode instruments. Sometimes, my friends, silence is the breaking point that forces us to reexamine our understanding of sound.

Camiele White suffers from too much film information. In order to remedy her psychosis she’s decided to write about it. Right now, she’s trying something a bit different and writes has her own blog called Madasa Writing. If you want to engage in a little conversation (at your own risk) she can be reached at madasa.writing@gmail.com
 

Thursday, 27 December 2012

The Weeping Meadow [2003]


The Weeping Meadow was the first film in Theo Angelopoulos’ last planned trilogy – that on modern Greece. However, thematically as well as aesthetically it felt like a companion piece to The Traveling Players and The Hunters, which belonged to his ‘Trilogy on History’. Even if it lacked the technical and structural audacity of the latter two films, it nonetheless had as breathtaking a scope, both historically and politically, and was nearly as mesmerizing an audio-visual experience. Spanning over 30 years of Greek history, from the Bolshevik Revolution in 1919, to the Greek Civil War in 1949, through a plethora of socio-political upheavals including the rise of Nazism in Europe and World War II, it was at once a highly political and a deeply personal film with elements of Greek Tragedy. At the forefront of this richly textured backdrop is the tragic love story of Alexis (Nikos Poursadinis), a talented accordionist, and Eleni (Alexandra Aidini), who Alexis’ father had planned to marry. Their lives are incessantly punctuated by historical developments, leading to a perpetually uprooted state – be it on account of the Red Army, the Nazi battery and political imprisonment, or poverty, hopes for employment, floods submerging their village and fleeing from Alexis’ obsessed father. Over the course of their journey, they forge a profound friendship with Nikos (Giorges Armenis), an avuncular violinist, and his closely-knit troupe of musicians. Gorgeously photographed in muted, washed out colours, accompanied by elegant long takes and a gently roving camera, hauntingly scored, and comprising of marvelous compositions, the film was filled with exquisite sequences and set-pieces, and is laced with deep melancholia and debilitating personal loss.








Director: Theo Angelopoulos
Genre: Drama/Political Drama/Historical Epic
Language: Greek
Country: Greece

Wednesday, 26 December 2012

Blue Velvet [1986]


Blue Velvet, David Lynch’s cult classic, painted a discomfiting and disorienting picture of the sordid underbelly of the mythical American Dream. Hence, as can be expected, it generated intensely polarizing reactions upon its release. It opens with a lush and idyllic vision of an upper middle-class suburb, the irony of which is gradually revealed thereafter. Jeffrey (Kyle Maclachlan), a dreamy young man fresh out of college, stumbles upon a chopped ear upon returning to his place of residence. Like a conscientious citizen he reports the matter to the police, but he also starts a parallel investigation of his own out of sheer curiosity. Stoked by the anecdotes provided by the cop’s naïve daughter Sandy (Laura Dern) and his latent craving for voyeurism, he decides to stalk on the beautiful, vulnerable and enigmatic night-club singer Dorothy (Isabella Rosellini), and before long finds himself plunging headlong into a nightmarish netherworld of drugs, violence, fetishism, sadomasochism, kidnapping and murder. Though his middle-class sensibilities make him fall for the uptight good-girl Sandy, his baser instincts make him sexually and perversely obsessed by the much older Dorothy, who is regularly abused by the hideous, psychopathic, nitrous-smoking Frank Booth (Dennis Hopper). Frank’s raging lunacy was brought forth by Hopper’s gleefully over-the-top performance, making him an evil incarnate and one of the most frightening screen villains, while Rosellini’s physical and emotional nakedness and the lilting title song, laced the film with a sense of mournfulness at loss of innocence. The film, however, retains its ability to shock mainstream audience even today on account of its grotesque vision, extreme violence and disturbing themes.









Director: David Lynch

Genre: Thriller/Crime Thriller/Mystery/Post Noir
Language: English
Country: US

Tuesday, 25 December 2012

Cry of the City [1948]

Robert Siodmak is best known for two of the greatest film noirs ever made, viz. The Killers and Criss Cross. Consequently, Cry of the City, despite being a taut, tense, morally ambiguous, and expertly photographed noir, has always existed in their shadows. This is a classic example of noirs where the terms ‘protagonist’ and ‘antagonist’ were rendered meaningless. The two opposing forces are represented by, Martin Rome (Richard Conte), an escaped convict being hunted for murdering a cop, and Lieutenant Candella (Victor Mature), a police detective obsessively pursuing him. On one hand, Rome is a conniving and unrepentant career criminal, and a dangerous role model for his gullible younger brother, while on the other, there exists a vulnerable side to him cloaked beneath his cocky veneer. In love with a young lady, chasing shady individuals with increasing desperation, weak and feverish on account of bullet wounds, and with hardly any place left to hide, he’s clearly the underdog who the audience roots for despite he being, quite unequivocally, on the wrong side of the law. Great pacing, splendid on-location photography and the menacing atmosphere, added upon the grimy setting, grim mood and unrelenting tension, making this a gripping watch, despite the familiar plot and fair share of flaws. Conte and Mature didn’t just give fine performances, their psychological duel added layers and dark underpinnings to the proceedings. The film also comprised of some memorable sequences – particularly, Rome’s nail-biting escape from a make-shift jail, and his fascinating interactions with a slimy, double-faced lawyer and a menacing masseuse. The film’s bleak underlying commentary on the corrupt and deeply unjust urban society, too, was noteworthy.








Director: Robert Siodmak
Genre: Film Noir/Crime Thriller/Police Detective Film
Language: English
Country: US

Monday, 24 December 2012

M [1931]


M, Fritz Lang’s first sound film and made when he was still based in Germany, has come to be recognized as a landmark early talkie. With its dark theme, nocturnal setting and expressionistic photography, it was also an important proto-noir. The film opens with the city of Berlin gripped by the fear of an elusive child killer. As he keeps leaving a trail of young girls in his path, two developments occur one after the other. The hapless police force literally turns the city into a crazy police state in their desperate bid to catch the murderer. The city’s crime syndicate, feeling the relentless heat of the suddenly hyper-active police force, begins a hunt for the man themselves using their vast network of mendicants and vagabonds. The man at the centre of this massive two-pronged attack is Hans Beckert (Peter Lorre), the slimy, deranged sociopath. In its iconic climax, Beckert, upon being finally captured by the underworld after a combing operation in a massive office building, is put on trial in a kangaroo court, and is told of their ability to judge by citing the times served by various gang-members. The film made a star out of Lorre who gave a delectably creepy, albeit gleefully over-the-top, performance. However, despite its sterling legacy, the movie hasn’t really aged well. The overtly theatrical set pieces and the histrionics by some of the cast members ended up serving as mood breakers, thus dampening the effects of the ominous atmospheric. The film, therefore, remains significant in today’s context mostly for its historical importance, its pre-Nazi allegory, and Lang’s innovative use of the then infant technology.








Director: Fritz Lang
Genre: Thriller/Crime Thriller/Proto-Noir/Police Detective Film/Gangster Film
Language: German
Country: Germany